Skip to main content
AREProject Management

A201 Claims, Disputes, Termination, and Remedies (Articles 12-15)

How AIA A201-2017 handles claims procedures, the Initial Decision Maker process, dispute resolution through mediation and arbitration, termination for cause and convenience, and the mutual waiver of consequential damages.

2 min read225 words

Claims, Disputes, and Termination Under A201: Why This Matters

Construction projects rarely go exactly as planned. Differing site conditions, schedule delays, cost disagreements, and scope disputes are part of the reality. AIA Document A201-2017, Articles 12 through 15, provides the contractual framework for handling these situations before they spiral into expensive litigation.

For the ARE, you need to understand how claims get initiated, who decides them first, and what happens when parties can't agree. The A201 lays out a structured escalation path: claims go to the Initial Decision Maker (typically the architect), then to mediation, and finally to binding dispute resolution through arbitration or litigation. Each step is a condition precedent to the next, meaning you can't skip ahead.

Termination provisions matter just as much. The owner can terminate the contractor for cause (when the contractor fails to perform) or for convenience (when the owner simply decides to stop the project). Each path triggers different compensation rules. The 2017 edition introduced a negotiated termination fee that replaced the older formula of overhead and profit on unexecuted work.

You'll also encounter the mutual waiver of consequential damages, the severability clause that keeps the contract alive even when one provision fails, and the 21-day claim initiation window. These aren't just contract trivia. They show up in exam scenarios where you need to advise on the correct procedural step or identify which party bears a particular risk.

Want to track your progress and access more study tools?

Create a free account