Skip to main content
AREPractice Management

Qualifications-Based Selection (QBS) and the Brooks Act

How federal and state governments select architects and engineers based on qualifications rather than price, the legal framework of the Brooks Act, the QBS process from public announcement through fee negotiation, and why this matters for architectural practice.

2 min read211 words

Why Architects Aren't Selected by Lowest Bid

When the federal government needs an architect or engineer, it doesn't just pick the cheapest option. It picks the most qualified one. That's been the law since 1972, when Congress passed the Brooks Act (Public Law 92-582).

The Brooks Act created a procurement method called Qualifications-Based Selection, or QBS. Under QBS, government agencies evaluate firms based on their competence, experience, and professional qualifications. Price doesn't enter the conversation until after the top firm has been chosen. Only then do the agency and firm sit down to negotiate a fee that's fair and reasonable.

This matters for your career and for the ARE. The QBS framework shapes how architectural firms pursue public-sector work, how they prepare SF330 qualification statements, and how they structure their business development efforts. Roughly 47 states have adopted their own versions of the Brooks Act, often called "mini-Brooks acts," so QBS isn't just a federal concept. It drives procurement at the state and local level too.

For the PcM exam, you need to understand the QBS process from start to finish: the public announcement, the qualifications evaluation, the shortlisting of at least three firms, the sequential negotiation procedure, and the rationale for separating qualifications from price. You also need to know when QBS applies and when it doesn't.

Want to track your progress and access more study tools?

Create a free account